Current location:sport >>
US Supreme Court Skeptical of Curbing Government Contact With Social Media Firms
sport72945People have gathered around
IntroductionWashington —A majority of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court appeared skeptical on Monday of efforts ...
A majority of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court appeared skeptical on Monday of efforts to impose restrictions on federal government efforts to curb misinformation online.
Both conservative and liberal justices on the nine-member court appeared reluctant to endorse a lower court's ruling that would severely limit government interactions with social media companies.
The case stems from a lawsuit brought by the Republican attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri, who allege that government officials went too far in their bid to get platforms to combat vaccine and election misinformation, violating the First Amendment free speech rights of users.
The lower court restricted top officials and agencies of Democratic President Joe Biden's administration from meeting and communicating with social media companies to moderate their content.
The ruling, which the Supreme Court put on hold until it heard the case, was a win for conservative advocates who allege that the government pressured or colluded with platforms such as Facebook and X, formerly Twitter, to censor right-leaning content under the guise of fighting misinformation.
Representing the Justice Department in the Supreme Court on Monday, Principal Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher said there is a "fundamental distinction between persuasion and coercion."
"The government may not use coercive threats to suppress speech, but it is entitled to speak for itself by informing, persuading or criticizing private speakers," he said.
The lower court, Fletcher said, "mistook persuasion for coercion."
Justice Samuel Alito, a conservative, said the record showed that government officials had engaged in "constant pestering of Facebook and some of the other platforms," treating them "like their subordinates."
"I cannot imagine federal officials taking that approach to the print media," Alito said.
But Chief Justice John Roberts, also a conservative, said the federal government does not speak with one voice.
"The government is not monolithic," Roberts said. "That has to dilute the concept of coercion significantly, doesn't it?"
Fletcher said interactions between health officials and social media platforms at the heart of the case needed to be viewed in light of "an effort to get Americans vaccinated during a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic."
"There was a concern that Americans were getting their news about the vaccine from these platforms and the platforms were promoting bad information," Fletcher said, adding that "the platforms were moderating content long before the government was talking to them."
'No place in our democracy'
J. Benjamin Aguinaga, the solicitor general of Louisiana, denounced what he called "government censorship," saying it has "no place in our democracy."
"The government has no right to persuade platforms to violate Americans' constitutional rights, and pressuring platforms in backrooms shielded from public view is not using the bully pulpit at all," Aguinaga said. "That's just being a bully."
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a liberal, pushed back, saying "my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways."
"Some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country." she said.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative, asked whether it would be coercion if someone in government calls up a social media company to point out something that is "factually erroneous information."
The lower court order applied to the White House and a slew of agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the State Department, the Justice Department as well as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The decision of the lower court restricted agencies and officials from meeting with social media companies or flagging posts.
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry hailed the lower court’s "historic injunction" at the time, saying it would prevent the Biden administration from “censoring the core political speech of ordinary Americans" on social media.
He accused federal officials of seeking to “dictate what Americans can and cannot say on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other platforms about COVID-19, elections, criticism of the government and more."
Some experts in misinformation and First Amendment law criticized the lower court ruling, saying that authorities needed to strike a balance between calling out falsehoods and veering toward censorship or curbing free speech.
Tags:
Reprint:Friends are welcome to share on the Internet, but please indicate the source of the article when reprinting it.“Stellar Space news portal”。http://honduras.chongwenmenhotelbeijing.com/news-85b399816.html
Related articles
With Djokovic awaiting the winner, Murray trails Hanfmann at rain
sportGENEVA (AP) — Needing a win to face Novak Djokovic next at the Geneva Open, Andy Murray was saved by ...
【sport】
Read moreSeabed mining critics furious after company pulls out of hearings
sportTrans Tasman Resources wants to extract iron, titanium and vanadium from an area off the Taranaki co ...
【sport】
Read moreI found BUGS wriggling in my Sainsbury's risotto rice
sportA mother was left horrified after discovering live bugs wriggling in her Sainsbury's risotto rice as ...
【sport】
Read more
Popular articles
- Investigators return to Long Island home of Gilgo Beach serial killing suspect
- I'm from Texas and live in the UK, these are all the weird things I've found about British people
- Ruapehu Alpine Lifts gets $7m bailout from government
- Moment police arrest teenager Brian Cohee who hid head of homeless man he murdered in closet
- Six killed in a 'foiled coup' in Congo, the army says
- Want a healthy dog? Vets reveal the 10 extreme body conformations owners should AVOID including flat
Latest articles
Shooting injures 2 at Missouri high school graduation ceremony
McDonald's is dishing out Chicken McNuggets at a discounted price
Scientists reveal the surest way to stop feeling angry in stressful situations
My 'morning sickness' ended up being cancer: Mother
Kristin Cavallari, 37, ignores critics of her age
Major NHS shake
LINKS
- Decade after divorce, woman finds new life on two wheels
- Xi Says BRICS Important Force in Shaping Int'l Landscape
- Top Leaders Attend Congress of Returned Overseas Chinese
- Energy majors fully embracing green wave
- Highlights of team competitions of 2022 Chinese National Table Tennis Championships
- Air route aims to boost Hainan free port status
- Paris 2024 Olympics to feature 10,000 torchbearers
- Xi Meets Senegalese President in Johannesburg
- New energy projects cater to Xizang's power needs
- Posters for Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics and Paralympics released